70 Comments
User's avatar
Teri's avatar

Bravo! I've been commenting all over the internet about evidence in Pennsylvania, plus Trump's comments about Musks "talent with voting machines" and that he "didn't need Musk's help to win in Pennsylvania. I feel quite sure that Musk wanted to insure his huge "campaign donation" illegal for him as a government contractor and his opportunity to enrich his contracts, etc. There were petitions for a hand count of paper ballots which were apparently ignored and I find that suspicious as well.

Expand full comment
Sue O''s avatar

Lately I’m stuck on WHY is the NY Rockland County Board of Elections opposed to Smart Elections’ work and calls for a recount?? They should be being pestering and shamed, each one of them, followed around with cameras asking for their comments

Expand full comment
Kirsten L. Held's avatar

Why wouldn't the democratic committee have done all this research themselves? I mean you would think that they would have every reason to look at all angles.

Expand full comment
Shirley Fessel's avatar

She was warned about possible hacking but she didn’t have full story or evidence. Still as a lifelong Dem, this is not the first time they have infuriated me with their decisions. They really make you work to stay.

Expand full comment
Simon Sez's avatar

They are afraid that history would repeat, death threats, assassinations, blackmails, this type of work cannot be done openly

until is sure that the proof is undeniable, as it is now. Also, some researcher just assigned to do it could be bought,

as well as senators can be bought.

It had to be an honest person, knowledgeable and interested sincerely to see it done, not politically motivated.

What they plan to do is genocide, millions of old people will die without Medicaid, we cannot allow this to happen!

Expand full comment
Maureen Brown's avatar

What's so upsetting is that assassinations have already occured in MN and the orange menace is constantly engaging in Stochastic Terrorism. Letting this regime put an evil plot into action is dangerous for hundreds of millions. So much reform is needed, but I still believe the people have the will to do it.

Expand full comment
Simon Sez's avatar

The democrats are willing to do it, always did. These thugs are only after money, how they can grab more and faster. They are not even republicans anymore they are white nationalists, fascists. It will be very difficult to get rid of them, the whole system is hacked and there is no judicial to defend the law, they hacked that too. Trump is a facade, a clown pushed in front to mask the real culprits: Peter Thiel, Russell Vought, Elon Musk, JD Vance and D Trump jr. These are the monsters behind the destruction. Read Project 2025, it’s all there:

https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

Expand full comment
Shai Key's avatar

Don’t forget Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller - or should I call him what he really is: President Miller?

Expand full comment
Simon Sez's avatar

Yeah, the creepy Peewee!

Expand full comment
Shai Key's avatar

SO creepy…..

Expand full comment
Joy Reynolds's avatar

They are all taking money from the big PACs so they don't make waves.

Expand full comment
Don Frazier's avatar

So Democrats are taking money to keep Democrats out of office?

Got it.

Expand full comment
Shai Key's avatar

There are Corporate Dems & there are Progressive Dems (Dem Socialists). Corporate Dems take dark money - just like Republicans take dark money. Dem Socialists do NOT take dark money. Corporate Dems do whatever is necessary to keep Dem Socialists out of office. Look what they did to Bernie Sanders when he ran against Hillary in the 2015 Dem primary.

They are trying to destroy Mamdani right now. So yes, Dems undermine Dems. Repubs ALWAYS stick together - ALWAYS. Dems greatest mistake is that we do not stick together. We really DO stand in a circular firing squad.

It’s self-sabotage.

Expand full comment
Simon Sez's avatar

Yes, they got the lesson now with Trump’s regime and still, they will sabotage Mamdani in NY with all they have. He will put them to pay taxes, imagine impertinence! A socialist to obligate the NY money to pay! Trump gives them a brake in taxes, we’ll pay for them.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
7d
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Simon Sez's avatar

You can correct the text by pressing the 3 small points down right at your post. That opens a window to allow edit. Took me a while to discover it!

Expand full comment
Shai Key's avatar

Thanks for the tip! Very nice!

Expand full comment
Joy Reynolds's avatar

No, they do (or don't do) whatever it takes to keep receiving the money.

Expand full comment
Kirsten L. Held's avatar

Okay, but look...if this is really true, there were enough interested parties on the side of a Harris win that it would have been very carefully looked at. Frankly, if it does turn out to be true that this manipulation was done, and it's only coming to light now after all the damage Trump has already been able to do, that would be very disheartening. As much as I would have preferred a Harris win, we should have the infrastructure in place to determine the absolute legitimacy of an election within a month of its having happened. Surely before the inauguration.

Expand full comment
Cynthia Santiglia's avatar

They spent all those years decrying election deniers. (For legitimate reasons.) I think it's very convoluted, and layered with nuance--- but even so, post election due diligence was certainly not performed as it should have been.

Expand full comment
Anne Thacker's avatar

A cyber expert, Stephen Spoonamore sent Harris a Duty to Warn letter I think maybe 4 or 5 days after the election, based on anomalies that he saw after analyzing swing state data...He was ignored...He has a substack and @spoonamore on Twitter...

Expand full comment
Shilo C's avatar

Agree with all that, only this was a very new voting machine hack, if it happened, using a modem that usually isn't thought of as an access point and always seemed "secure." But the tech bros specialize in making everything not secure against them. It doesn't fall in the usual category of first month due diligence/recounting and probably takes time to uncover. In the interest of protecting elections going forward we should pursue this until it's ruled out or dead ends. Not to change the result but to protect the future.

Expand full comment
Kirsten L. Held's avatar

Oh I totally agree that we should find out one way or the other. All I'm saying is that I will be pretty pissed and dismayed if it's found to be true that Trumps supporters manipulated things. Not surprised, mind you. But pissed and dismayed that there wasn't anyone capable of figuring it out sooner.

Expand full comment
cheecheeslide's avatar

AIPAC

Expand full comment
Cindy Scott's avatar

I have sent all the information to multiple attorneys General, governors, senators congressmen and women. No reply, no comment, nada, nothing, zip.

Expand full comment
cheecheeslide's avatar

AIPAC

Expand full comment
Kai Colbourne's avatar

Too bad United States isn't a real country of laws and under terrorist coup. You learn a lot about a country, from the way it treats its deadly insurrectionists, pedophiles, rapists, serial felons and elections thieves vs how it treats its law abiding citizens. This bell won’t ever be unrung.

Expand full comment
Andrea Fields's avatar

Wow, I just watched your presentation and you are awesome! I’m all in and will help in any way I can. I started a protest group in my community in late March called Stand Up For Your Rights!, and we’re growing by leaps and bounds. We have dedicated activists who I know will join the movement! Thank you for all your hard work and dedication.

Expand full comment
Cam's avatar

Thank you for your hard work on this. As a retired researcher, I know this evidence is solid. I have shared posts here and on Bluesky with a several

senators and three attorney generals.

Expand full comment
Robert Gaines's avatar

Thank you for pushing back. I'm mentally disabled on SSI and Medicaid. I wish I could contribute, especially since it sounds like you're working hard to save my and other's lives with that genocide thing. I wouldn't even know how I could begin to give back for what you are doing for us. I don't want to be disabled, but ever since I once attempted to end myself, I've been fighting to stay alive. I just want to live.

Expand full comment
Donna Stowe's avatar

OMG. I have been keeping up with your posts, but the charts in this video Don’t Lie.

The speed at which this administration is working is not just a move toward autocracy, but an attempt to coverup/erase any trail of stolen elections - the 2024 Election.

Expand full comment
Galeforce's avatar

Yes none of it made sense. Something is definitely not right here.

Expand full comment
Reid Cole-Hatchard's avatar

And before she won, she won. Two extremely qualified, respected woman.

Expand full comment
Simon Sez's avatar

Brilliant analysis, thank you for your work, we are behind you, whatever you need.

Expand full comment
Navy Mom Cinlei's avatar

This goes to threads not you tube

Expand full comment
Nicole's avatar

Yes it does that is where it came from.

Expand full comment
Navy Mom Cinlei's avatar

Why doesn’t someone meet with Gavin Newsome in CA?

Expand full comment
Melissa's avatar

Well, I've yet to find the video. Been here, been there, heard palaver (minimally interesting about "we" and "us"), but saw no sign of a video. Have followed this with great hope, sigh. Where the aitch-ee-double-toothpicks is THE VIDEO???

Expand full comment
SunShine's avatar

On you tube, follow the link

Expand full comment
Shilo C's avatar

How can i verify who "This Will Hold" is and how donations are used? I will never give money to someone unless i'm 100% sure they are above board. I of course hope they are, but how to know?

Expand full comment
Martha Bolt's avatar

Yes Kamala Harris DID WIN the 2024 presidential election

Expand full comment
According to Jax's avatar

Sent a letter via email to both of my senators. They’re both Dems.

Expand full comment