Why Thomas Massie Should Be Keeping an Eye on Peter Thiel’s Polymarket
And why this country needs to start using common sense when it comes to election “coincidences.”
What we really need to be watching is Thomas Massie’s primary in Kentucky—and applying some common sense.
Why? Consider the following:
Donald Trump’s approval rating has fallen to 37%, historically lower in a second year than any president this century.
Thomas Massie gave MAGA voters exactly what many of them demanded: transparency regarding the Jeffrey Epstein files.
He also refused to support legislation that would harm his constituents while further exploding the national debt.
Yet suddenly, Trump’s handpicked candidate is surging on Peter Thiel’s Polymarket?
Yes—Peter Thiel’s Polymarket. In May 2024, Thiel’s venture capital firm, Founder’s Fund, participated in a $45 million funding round for the online betting platform.
And money is now flooding into the Massie v. Gallerein bet, just as it did in 2024 when bettors heavily backed Trump over Kamala Harris and Polymarket predicted the exact outcome of the election on October 30, 2024.
Have we collectively memory-holed that?
Because that was not the only notable thing that happened on October 30, 2024.
That same day, Elon Musk announced the completion of Starlink’s final pre-election Direct-to-Cell (DTC) satellite launch, activating the constellation just in time for Election Day and bringing the total to 265 units.
But wait, there’s more.
Also on October 30, 2024, shares of GOP-aligned Chain Bridge Bank surged to more than three times their average trading volume since the IPO roughly a month earlier, sharply driving up the share price.
Why does that matter?
Because in its initial filing, Elon Musk’s voter-information harvesting platform and Trump fundraising vehicle, America PAC, listed Chain Bridge Bank as its financial institution.
Founded by former Senator Peter Fitzgerald (R-IL), Chain Bridge is a one-branch bank catering almost exclusively to Republicans and has handled the campaign funds for every GOP presidential candidate since John McCain in 2008.
Now back up to October 4, 2024—just one month before the election.
Chain Bridge launched the first IPO by a U.S. financial institution in more than two years, despite the offering being announced less than a week beforehand.
According to Reuters: “The bank’s fortunes are closely tied to the Party. Chain Bridge has warned in its paperwork that ‘any event that negatively impacts the Republican Party … could lead to significant deposit outflows.’”
Meanwhile, Polymarket odds between September 12 and October 3, 2024 showed Vice President Kamala Harris leading Trump, while many national polls at the time suggested Democrats held even larger advantages.
Which raises an obvious question:
Why would investors aggressively buy into a politically exposed IPO—one explicitly warning of severe losses if Republicans lost—unless they possessed extraordinary confidence in the outcome?
So let’s recap the timeline:
January 2024 — Musk begins fast-tracking the launch of the new low-earth-orbit DTC constellation.
February 2024 — Musk files paperwork for his America PAC. (So his support had nothing to do with the “assassination” attempt as claimed.)
May 2024 — Peter Thiel funds Polymarket.
May 2024 — Eaton Corporation, with access to roughly 70% of U.S. election equipment infrastructure, announces a deepening relationship with Thiel’s Palantir.
July 2024 — Musk launches America PAC, a voter-information harvesting and Trump fundraising operation, using Republican Chain Bridge as its financial institution.
September 2024 — Eaton, with access to roughly 70% of U.S. election equipment infrastructure, partners with Elon Musk and Tesla.
October 4, 2024 — Chain Bridge launches its IPO.
October 5, 2024 — According to The New York Times, Elon Musk texts a friend:
“I’m feeling more optimistic after tonight. Tomorrow we unleash the anomaly in the matrix.” An hour later, he adds: “This isn’t something on the chessboard, so they’ll be quite surprised. ‘Lasers’ from space.”
October 7, 2024 — Musk laughingly tells Tucker Carlson in an interview: “If Trump loses I’m fu*cked. How long do you think my prison sentence is going to be?”
October 30, 2024 — the DTC satellites launch, activating the constellation of 265 units, less than a week before Election Day.
October 30, 2024 — Republican Chain Bridge Bank shares surge to more than three times average trading volume.
October 30, 2024 — Polymarket predicts the exact outcome of the presidential election.
It’s almost like everything is connected to Elon’s launch on October 30. I’m sure it’s fine. Nothing to see here, right Democrats?
Then, on November 5, 2024, Donald Trump, a 34-count convicted felon and adjudicated sexual predator who had to pay people on Craigslist to attend his rallies, somehow won all the swing states just above the threshold for an automatic recount, 88 counties flipped red, none flipped blue, and he did it with less than 50% of the vote.
Even Ronald Reagan didn’t accomplish that.
Even stranger, in the swing states, Democratic voters supposedly voted blue down-ballot and then switched to Trump at the top of the ticket.
And according to Joe Rogan, Elon Musk knew the results several hours beforehand—and Donald Trump thanked Elon Musk for his knowledge of those “vote-counting computers.”
On June 5, 2025, Elon Musk announced to the world that he won the 2024 election for Trump: “Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.”
Yet the entire Democratic Party continues to look the other way.
Meanwhile, the DNC refuses to release the 2024 “autopsy,” but would have voters believe Democrats were so frustrated with Vice President Harris’s stance on Gaza that they voted for Donald Trump instead.
Which not only fails to make sense on its face given Trump’s Muslim ban and open cooperation with Netanyahu, but we’re also supposed to believe that the base of the Democratic Party—particularly Black voters in the swing states—voted blue down-ballot while simultaneously choosing Trump at the top of the ticket.
Ha. As Gramps would say, “That dog don’t hunt on any day that ends in ‘ay.’”
Which makes us wonder whether, for the last 18 months, we’ve been approaching this the wrong way.
Perhaps it’s time to start having conversations with Republicans like Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene about the stolen elections instead of expecting (begging) the Democratic establishment to act.
And yes, Thomas Massie needs to keep a very close eye on Peter Thiel’s Polymarket.
Thank you for being here and hold onto your hope. This is not left vs. right—it’s all of us vs. the Epstein class. Again, we don’t need permission to enforce the Constitution. We just need courage.
Want the truth they’re not telling you? For fearless reporting and expert-backed research, read The Common Coalition Report. And if you believe in funding real, independent work—subscribe to our Substack or support our all-volunteer team here.
I have been saying this since election night. One question, WHY THE HECK HASNT ANYONE DONE SOMETHING ABOUT IT 🤨🤔😡🔥‼️ And I’ll keep asking this same question. Where’s the media on this??? UGH 🤦♀️😤😠😡
Thank you for a more thorough explanation of how Musk’s “laser’s from space, Thiel’s Polymarket and Thiel’s investment in Eaton’s voting systems WORKED to steal the 2024 election!
The “remote” controls changed millions of DEMOCRATIC BALLOTS from Harris to TRUMP the last minute, IN EVERY SWING DISTRICT!
The smoking gun is MILLIONS OF DEMOCRATIC voters switched to TRUMP in the swing districts, BUT still voted DEMOCRATIC down-ballot!
However, their cousins in the NON-swing districts did NOT switch! NO SUCH ODDBALL phenomenon in the non-swing districts!
STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE!
TRUMP LOST IN 2024!
Face the facts!