The 2024 Election Whistleblowers Were Right—Everything Is Tied To Epstein

The DOJ Has Been Neutered. Democratic-Led State Investigations Are the Path Forward.

In the four months since we published our first whistleblower article, we’ve met every bit of scrutiny and doubt with the information we had at the time. And with the current revelations, this is one of those moments when we genuinely loathe being right.

The unresolved Epstein files, according to the whistleblowers, implicated powerful figures and corporations ranging from Jes Staley of JP Morgan to Les Wexner, John Paulson and others. This helps to explain the silence surrounding the 2024 election—and Congress’s refusal to challenge Trump’s appointees no matter how unqualified, or his unconstitutional actions, no matter how heinous.

We’ll Take Treason For $500, Alex

Post-election, we watched in disbelief as Trump thanked Elon Musk for his prowess with those “vote-counting computers.” Then Trump and his inner circle went oddly quiet about their so-called victory. No triumphant parties, no over-the-top celebrations—nothing.

Their behavior was strangely cautious. It took Vance nearly two weeks to update his title on social media, and there was even debate about holding the inauguration themselves a few days early—an idea quickly shut down as unconstitutional.

As if that’s not weird enough, consider this: the largest campaign contributor to the newly “elected” president—who launched his Twitter bid at $20 billion over market value just 49 days after Putin invaded Ukraine, then transformed it into a pro-Russia, Trump-for-President dumpster fire—had access to our vote-counting computers.

Why?

Bonus: it was also revealed that Musk had been communicating with Putin for more than two years and Russian troops had access to Starlink.

And not one individual in the Democratic Party questioned a single thing. No investigations. No hearings. Nothing.

$44 billion on Twitter and $250 million in direct contributions to Trump’s campaign should have set off every alarm. The base of the Democratic Party was asking why Trump’s largest campaign contributor had access to our “vote-counting computers,” why the swing-state election data was so statistically absurd, and why the Democrats wouldn’t respond?

The whistleblowers had an explanation: silence was leveraged across both the government and private sectors to force acceptance of the election results—despite an NSA-authorized audit that proved Harris won in a landslide, an audit no one can seem to procure. It seemingly vanished the moment the data was handed over.

To put it simply, specific billionaires and foreign actors wanted Trump in the White House, and the Epstein files proved to be the conduit.

You can’t very well bankroll a political party if the check-writers are in prison, can you? And with Kamala Harris in the presidency, the writing was on the wall—in permanent marker.

The Resurfacing of the Epstein Files

After taking office in January, Trump appointed his personal attorney, Todd Blanche, as Deputy Attorney General—the number-two position at the DOJ. With Blanche in place, Pam Bondi was confirmed as Attorney General in March, positioning her to continue what she had started in Florida: protecting Trump from legal exposure, including the Epstein scandal.

In July, Blanche traveled to FCI Tallahassee to conduct a softball interview with convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, during which she gave Trump a glowing review.

Blanche asked Maxwell whether people around Epstein were associating with him for the purpose of sexual encounters. Maxwell replied that some of the “cast of characters” around Epstein were “in your cabinet, who you value as your co-workers.”

It’s worth noting that just days after that interview, Maxwell was transferred from FCI Tallahassee to Federal Prison Camp Bryan, a minimum-security camp in Bryan, Texas, where she now spends time gardening and has been gifted a new puppy. The transfer took place around August 1, 2025, and was not disclosed to the survivors of Epstein’s trafficking ring.

Meanwhile, a recently unsealed report identified at least $25 million in payments from Epstein to Ghislaine Maxwell from his JPMC accounts. If we’ve learned anything over the last few months, it’s the depth of the corruption—and that it seemingly has no bottom.

What Leverage Looks Like

TWH: “Are you willing to go public with your team’s findings?”
WB: “Public testimony would need to occur after the rightful president is in office, but yes, of course. Or a member on the team, we have several that can speak to the intricacies.”
TWH: “Intricacies such as…?”
WB: “Why Gelsinger’s exit happened when it did; the CBS sale; why JP Morgan funded Epstein; Lindsey Graham’s October 2024 visit with Oracle in Israel; the NSO Group activity that led to the WhatsApp case; and the subsequent series of rulings not involving Meta or OpenAI.”
TWH: “All of which is tied to the 2024 election?”
WB: “Yes. And the Epstein files. It’s not just ‘the Epstein list’—it’s a decades-long effort with multiple layers. Check out his [Epstein’s] travel, October through early-November 2016. And again, note Sen. Graham’s early-October 2024 visit to Israel.”
TWH: “That date looks off… Was it the following week? If the Epstein files and breach logs were released, wouldn’t that clean the system out?”
WB: “You’re probably right on the date. Clean? How much of the world economy is managed by very few people? ‘Cataclysm’ comes to mind.”
TWH: “So much of what they’re doing is unconstitutional. Crimes against humanity are on the rise across the globe. Who has proof of the NSA-authorized audit, and why are they sitting on it?”
WB: “Constiwhat? Think about the players involved and ask yourself that question again. Multiple individuals have the data. I’ll be traveling; I need to be where the banks aren’t controlled by JPM.”
TWH: “Would the data shore up the November numbers?”
WB: “Yes. It’s 100% Pentagon-certified that she won.”
TWH: “Okay. We discussed a proxy…”
WB: “There’s no reasonable vantage point where me going public provides more credibility to the topic… for now.”
TWH: “And that’s due to the current administration.”
WB: “Correct. Reach out to Andrew Couts. Needless to say there are more issues than simply Trump.”
TWH: “To tell him what, exactly?”
WB: “Tell him… The guy at the center needs some flexibility.”

Four months post-investigation, the pieces are coming together, as each tranche of emails is released, more names are linked, and in some cases, consequences are handed out. Prince Andrew’s full title removal makes him the highest-ranking royal in a century to be formally stripped of his titles.

And now we have proof of the JPMorgan SAR filed in 2019, warning the Trump administration of Epstein’s “possible” ties to sex trafficking. Paging Bill Barr to the Senate for questioning.

According to a document released by the Senate Committee on Finance: “The unsealed records show that Epstein’s accounts were closely supervised by senior JPMC executives reporting directly to CEO Jamie Dimon, including operating committee member Mary Erdoes.” Jeffrey Epstein was one of JPMC’s top five largest private clients and part of an elite group referred to as the “Wall of Cash.”

“My staff is releasing a new report showing JPMorgan Chase executives – all the way to the top – enabled Epstein’s sex trafficking operation.” – Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR)

These revelations further support the whistleblowers’ statements about the power players embedded in Epstein’s trafficking network and why their silence could be leveraged.

On a historical note, keep in mind we’ve been here before—in 1933, when a group of wealthy businessmen tried to burn down democracy to protect their profits. They attempted to recruit General Smedley S. Butler, promising him an army of 500,000 men and the financial backing of several powerful industrialists, so long as he was willing to lead a “peaceful” march on the White House to displace Roosevelt. And yes, JPMorgan was involved then, too.

Gen. Butler went to Congress, prompting the formation of the McCormack–Dickstein Committee investigation—the precursor to the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). And, as usual, none of the wealthy men behind the plot were ever punished.

To recap the whistleblowers: “Why Gelsinger’s exit happened when it did; the CBS sale; why JPMorgan funded Epstein; Lindsey Graham’s October 2024 visit with Oracle in Israel; the NSO Group activity that led to the WhatsApp case; and the subsequent series of rulings not involving Meta or OpenAI.”

About Those Tapes

From the last tranche of released Epstein communications, note the following exchange:
“Will keep a note NOT to use my films as foreplay”
“her fucking the guy under the lifeguard chair ! whoops, that one does have meaning”
“your films work as foreplay for a former Isis wife”

Think about that response. “A former Isis wife.”
Emails and innuendo are one thing, but it’s not hard to understand why men with immense power would be terrified of any video evidence of themselves raping underage girls coming to light. People with this much to lose have every incentive to control political outcomes—including stealing an election or covering up one that was stolen.

Across his properties, Epstein maintained an unusually expansive surveillance system—cameras positioned throughout bedrooms, bathrooms, hallways, entry points, common areas, and exterior grounds in New York, Palm Beach, and Little St. James.

One of Epstein’s accusers, Maria Farmer, said she was shown cameras throughout his Manhattan home and observed screens displaying footage of toilets and beds in private rooms:

“They were monitors inside this cabinet. And there were men sitting here. And I looked on the cameras, and I saw toilet, toilet, bed, bed, toilet, bed. I’m like, ‘I am never gonna use the restroom here and I’m never gonna sleep here,’ you know what I mean? It was very obvious that they were, like, monitoring private moments.”

When the FBI raided his Manhattan townhouse in July 2019, agents found a safe containing hard drives, stacks of CDs and additional media. Yet despite the breadth of Epstein’s surveillance setup, no corresponding archive of video footage has ever been publicly produced, leaving open questions about what those devices contained and why so little of his recorded material has surfaced.

A partial list of evidence recovered during the 2019 raid on Epstein’s New York residence documents the following:

• (1)DVD-R containing image log files

• Three (3) LTO 6 tape cartridges containing an Arcserve backup of all digital evidence from Submission ID 219407.

• Two(2) LTO 6 tape cartridges containing an Arcserve backup of all digital evidence from Submission ID 215974.

• (1) Envelope containing 1 VHS tape, 2 cassette tapes & 4 micro cassette tapes.

• (1) Envelope containing 4 CD’s.

• Highly confidential responsive material to include nude and semi nude images and videos from digital evidence items processed by CART.

• HP Tower S/N: CNV74213M3 Model: 570-p056

• Lenovo Tower S/N: 1S3306G2UMJXEKGX

• Lenovo Tower S/N: MJ07YG6U Machine type: 90J0

• Mac DesktopS/N: W89524CZSPJ model A1312

• HP TowerS/N: CNV716004YModel #: 260-a010

• HP Desktop TowerS/N: CNV7160050Model #: 260-a010

• Silver Mac desktop

• 6 Bay with 146GB drivesS/N: MXQ824A1R

• One box containing Panasonic KX-TDE100S/N: KX-TDA01049LCCD005398

• HP server with (4) 500 GB drivesS/N: MXQ3220187

• Unifi serverMacID: 1735K788A20463234-8uuu9FFCCID: SWX-UASPRO

• Unifi videoM/N: UVC-NVR-2TBMacID: 1829FB4FBE426EA90

• One cellophane containing:Paper with passwords on both sides

• Unifi Cloud keyM/N: UN-CKFCCID: SWX-UCCKIC 6545A-UCCKMac ID: 1843KB4FBE4D30C69-dcRgm9

• CELLOPHANE containing Olympus Digital Voice Recorder

• Silver Mac desktopModel #: A1311S/N: W804736DDAS

• Dell Inspiron tower with power cordReg Model: D19MQCHFA335

“This partial list represents well over 30 terabytes of storage—tens of millions of files and tens of thousands of hours of video. And this is only a fraction of what investigators catalogued from the New York residence. The full inventory is far more extensive and doesn’t include the Florida estate, Little St. James, the Paris apartment, or Zorro Ranch in New Mexico.”

Now that more has been exposed, over 41% of the Democratic base would like our leaders to stop pretending that a loathsome, misogynistic, 34-count convicted felon and adjudicated sexual predator somehow outperformed Ronald Reagan’s 1984 election statistics.

And we still want to know why Trump’s biggest campaign contributor had access to our “vote-counting computers,” why the swing-state data is so statistically absurd, and when Democratic leaders and state attorneys general plan to investigate.

What We Can Do Together

The midterms won’t save us. We can’t run the same game plan on the same election equipment and expect anything different from 2024.

It’s up to us—We the People—to push Democratic-led states to open investigations into Elon Musk and the DOGE boys before the midterms.

Pennsylvania is just as corrupt as Trump—but Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, New York, and California aren’t.

We’ve been circulating the statistically absurd data for close to a year, and we’re running out of time. We need millions of Americans to apply pressure to Democratic-led states to open investigations.

YOU can: call, email, and tag Democratic state attorneys general. Trump’s claim that Musk had access to “those vote-counting computers” should have triggered immediate investigations by attorneys general, especially in the swing states.

Seriously. Where are the DOGE boys? And what were they doing in the weeks leading up to, and on, November 5, 2024?

YOU can: support independent journalism—circulate this Substack series to everyone you know and ask them to do the same.

And as the Declaration of Independence reminds us, “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…”—a standard of legitimacy our leaders can’t simply ignore.

Hold on to your hope. Because again—we don’t need permission to enforce the Constitution. We just need courage.

Want the truth they’re not telling you? For fearless reporting and expert-backed research, read The Common Coalition Report. And if you believe in funding real, independent work—support our all-volunteer team here.