She Won, Part V: Why The Missing Votes In Rockland County Matter

And how this little lawsuit could trigger a nationwide audit of the paper.

Before we dive in, remind yourself: in a healthy democracy, if there were nothing to hide, this process wouldn’t be playing out in a courtroom.

The Rockland County Board of Elections should want to get to the bottom of these missing votes. Instead, they forced a lawsuit—which they’re actively fighting to have dismissed in court today.

Next, it’s important for readers to understand that the typical drop-off rate in a presidential race falls between 1–2%.

Drop-off refers to the difference in vote totals between a presidential candidate and a major down-ballot candidate from the same party.

• A large positive drop-off indicates that the presidential candidate overperformed, receiving more votes than is typical relative to their party's down-ballot candidates.

• A large negative drop-off indicates an underperformance, meaning the presidential candidate received significantly fewer votes than expected—potentially signaling that votes may be missing from their totals.

Oceanfront Property In Arizona

We’ve spent so much time poring over the data in Pennsylvania and North Carolina that it didn’t seem fair to leave the other swing states out of the spotlight.

And when we said “dive in,” we meant it—Republicans are trying to sell the American people something that doesn’t exist, not physically or mathematically.

Those drop-off percentages? Have a look. Remember, they typically fall between 1% and 2%. In Arizona, however, Trump supposedly overperformed by 9.86%, while Vice President Harris underperformed by 5.91%.

Does that oceanfront property come with a dock, by chance?

See the Arizona election data from 2016? A little up here, a bit down there. Messy and chaotic—you know, like people.

Now look at 2024. See how the data shows a consistent overperformance for Trump, matched by an underperformance for Harris—across the board in every single county?

That’s not organic. And it’s not human behavior. It’s an algorithm—and it appears uniformly across the swing states and Texas.

According to the

Election Truth Alliance

data, Arizona reflects a minimum of 118,620 anomalous votes; Michigan, 65,263; North Carolina, 206,981; Pennsylvania, 225,440; and Wisconsin, 20,436.

**None of these totals account for the hundreds of thousands of voters whose ballots have gone “missing.”

And don’t forget: in both North Carolina and Pennsylvania, Dr. Walter Mebane—the gold standard in election forensics—reviewed the data and confirmed the findings.

Which brings us to the subject of this week’s article: Why the missing votes in Rockland County matter.

Looking Under Rocks In Rockland

The

SMART Elections

“missing votes” lawsuit in Rockland County is seeking a full hand recount of the 2024 presidential and U.S. Senate races—and while the case may seem small, it could prove to be a tipping point.

No, we’re not focusing (yet) on the cultural anomaly or the undervote percentage for Vice President Harris in Ramapo. Right now, we’re focusing on the missing votes for candidate Sare.

According to the complaint, more voters swore they cast ballots for her than the Rockland County Board of Elections recorded and certified—directly contradicting the official results.

Good Things Come In Small Packages

So why does this small case—with just four missing votes—matter? Because seven people signed sworn affidavits stating they voted in person on Election Day, and yet the Board only recorded three of those ballots.

That means 44% of Sare’s votes are missing in Ramapo District 39. And in this tiny district, that’s not just statistically significant—it’s impossible to ignore.

If a statewide hand recount were to confirm more missing ballots, it could expose a broader failure—or outright manipulation—within the system. Did millions of voters really “stay home” on Election Day, like the pundits claim? Or were their votes simply “disappeared”?

This is exactly what we’ve been trying to unpack since the data became available: hundreds of thousands of voters reporting that their ballots never showed up—paired with Election Day data that doesn’t look human-generated in the swing states and Texas.

In other words, this case was caught because it’s so small—and yet it’s big enough that it just might force a national response.

The Math Ain’t Mathing

67% to 33%—when reverse-engineering the swing state data to give Vice President Harris back her votes—don’t these numbers seem more likely?

Trump couldn’t fill a stadium. He bopped around to “YMCA” for 40 minutes and refused to answer questions. He wouldn’t shut up about Hannibal Lecter. For a year he told the country that he didn’t need their votes.

So HOW did 88 counties flip red, none flipped blue, and he supposedly won every swing state—just above the threshold to avoid an automatic recount?

We already did that math: it’s a 1 in 50 octillion chance of happening without a fairy godmother.
Make it make sense.

Putting The Rhythmn In Algorithm

Four of the previously mentioned state-level totals are enough to change the outcome in that state—which, in turn, changes the outcome of the entire election.

So yes—the Rockland County case is small, but it’s mighty.

And if the RCBOE succeeds in getting the case dismissed today, every American should be outraged—and demanding answers.

Taking Action:

What YOU can do—circulate this Substack series to everyone, ask them to do the same. “We the People” are the media now.

Sign the ETA petition for a hand count of the paper ballots in Pennsylvania—we’d like to get to the bottom of those 225,000 questionable ballots, of which 111,088 have been identified as intentional, malevolent manipulations.

Then email, call, and tag state attorneys general and members of Congress on social media. They don’t have to be your own. It only takes one to step up and get this process moving. Remind them: They work for us.

Because again—we don’t need permission to enforce the Constitution. We just need courage.

Want the truth they’re not telling you? For fearless reporting and expert-backed research, read The Common Coalition Report. And if you believe in funding real, independent work—support our all-volunteer team here.