Groyper and Steve Bannon's Online Machine to Radicalize Boys.

Inside the Digital Empire That's Turning Boys Into Far-Right Radicals.

*We don’t celebrate the loss of life, no matter how profound our disagreements may have been. Our thoughts are with Charlie Kirk’s family and friends as they navigate the road ahead.

The Perfect Far-Right Storm

Before, and especially during the height of COVID, teachers and academics became far more familiar with the ins and outs of the Shapiro, Kirk, and Fuentes online turf wars and the Groyper dumpster fire than we ever wanted to be.

Add Andrew Tate and his so-called “Hustler’s University” to the mix, and suddenly you find yourself nostalgic for the days of Molly Ringwald movies, when the biggest concerns about teenagers were house parties “hosted” by perpetually vacationing parents, trash-can punch, and games of spin the bottle.

The Quiet Recruitment You Never Saw Coming

We’ve seen parents try everything to keep their children active and engaged: balls, rackets, oars, clubs, swimsuits, martial arts uniforms, and fishing rods—you name it, they’ve tried it.

These parents have been nothing short of tenacious in their effort to find healthy physical outlets for their children. But for some of them, none of it stuck.

Eventually, parents and teachers alike made peace with the reality that technology and gaming were here to stay, and thought we understood what parenting and teaching in the digital age would look like.

What most of us didn’t realize was how much we would learn about what children were hearing online by simply switching from headsets to speakers. During COVID, many parents did this to better hear their children’s lessons.

Flooding The Zone

I was positioned to support families and teachers, helping students navigate the turbulent waters of Covid. But beyond the classroom lessons—the conversations during gaming sessions and videos playing in the background—was something deeply disturbing.

The most insidious part of this far-right online ecosystem is that these children hadn’t merely wandered into a dark corner of the internet.

This was, and still is, a carefully engineered operation, born from a 2014 partnership between Steve Bannon and Milo Yiannopoulos, designed to wage psychological warfare by preying on an entire generation of boys and young men.

The mission: manipulate vulnerable boys into carrying the torch for the same racist, misogynistic power brokers who have dominated the predominantly white, male GOP for decades.

When I say they prey on young boys, I mean it’s everywhere. This isn’t some obscure rabbit hole. It’s integrated into their daily lives:

• YouTube ads carefully crafted to appeal to lonely or insecure young men.

• Gaming platforms crafted to shape specific worldviews, some tied to the Pentagon.

• Social media “influencers” and relentless targeted ads. On META alone, TPUSA has bought close to 10,000 ads.

• Even so-called “self-help” content, like Jordan Peterson’s lectures, luring them in with advice about discipline and purpose—only to radicalize them with resentment towards women, anger, and fear.

This is a well-coordinated machine targeting boys at their most impressionable age.

The Radicalization Pipeline

Here’s the part that’s hardest to explain to those who haven’t lived it: These three figures aren’t just competitors—they’re part of a continuum.

Picture a boy starting his political journey:

1. He clicks on a Shapiro debate video titled “Debunking Feminism.”

2. In college, he joins a TPUSA chapter, drawn by the promise of friends and meaning, as they lean him into misogyny and racism.

3. Late one night, he stumbles into a Fuentes livestream on Rumble, where all the “jokes” suddenly carry weight.

This is by design.
It’s a funnel—carefully built to move boys deeper into extremism one step at a time.

Parents are relieved their sons aren’t watching Fuentes. Donors are relieved they’re funding Kirk and Shapiro instead of outright radicals.
But it’s all the same machine.

Shapiro, Kirk, Fuentes: Three Sects of the Far-Right Ecosystem

Make no mistake, there’s something for everyone in this mixed bag of GOP/MAGA conditioning:

1. Ben Shapiro: The “Respectable” Gateway

Ben Shapiro began building his following through Breitbart News during Bannon’s tenure. He’s clean-cut, fast-talking, and precise. He never swears and debates calmly, using phrases like “logical fallacy” and “let’s look at the data.”

To nervous parents, he seems like a safe choice—a sign their son is “simply exploring politics.”

But here’s the trap:
Shapiro is a gateway drug. He doesn’t scream racial slurs or call for violence. Instead, he slowly reshapes how young men think about feminism, immigration, and social justice.

It’s not radicalization all at once. It’s conversion by a thousand debate clips.

2. Charlie Kirk: The Campus Crusader

Through Turning Point USA (TPUSA), Kirk appeared on Bannon’s War Room, leveraging exposure and funding sources to grow a vast campus network. His message was draped in flags and Bible verses, selling politics as both patriotic duty and divine mission.

For boys longing for community, TPUSA offered something deeper than ideology: belonging.

• Conferences with cheering crowds.

• Campus chapters where everyone wears the same T-shirt.

• The promise of being on the “front lines” of “saving America.”

It looks wholesome to parents who aren’t on campus to hear the racism, misogyny, and homophobia—all packaged neatly inside a Christian nationalist box. But behind the scenes, TPUSA is a movement bankrolled by billionaires, designed to turn young men into foot soldiers for a far-right agenda.

3. Nick Fuentes: The Dark Id

At the bottom of the funnel sits Nick Fuentes and the Groypers, true heirs to Milo Yiannopoulos’ toxic empire.

Fuentes livestreams hours of content filled with calls for misogyny, white nationalism and antisemitism. He appeals to boys and young men who are angry, alienated, and ready to burn the whole system down.

They gather in shadowy online spaces like 4chan and Reddit—on threads where anger isn’t just expressed, it’s understood and even celebrated. Conversations are layered with code and memes, inside jokes, and cryptic slang that turn hatred into entertainment.

Where Shapiro offers order and Kirk offered purpose, Fuentes offers pure chaos. He takes every simmering grievance and turns it into a nihilistic bonfire.

To parents, he’s the nightmare scenario. To a certain type of lonely, rage-filled teen, he’s a hero. In a world where everything is for the LOLs, even tragedy can be reduced to a punchline—and sometimes, that punchline is death.

The Bannon Blueprint

The connection to Steve Bannon didn’t land on the radar until 2019, when research for another book led me down an unexpected path.

Long story short, Bannon took the failure of a 2007 gaming-adjacent company and turned it into the blueprint for his political empire. This company had introduced a cheat into the gaming world called “gold farming.” Imagine that—Steve Bannon, cheating at something. I digress.

Gamers hated it.
They felt it ruined the integrity of the game.

So they did what gamers do best—they organized online. Millions of players pressured Blizzard Entertainment to shut down the cheat, and ultimately, they won.

What Bannon took away from this failure wasn’t just about gaming. He saw something far more valuable: a massive, untapped population of young men, mostly white, who lived chronically online—angry, isolated, and capable of moving as one.

The Playbook: From Gaming to Politics

In 2014 Bannon began the cultivation of what most political operatives missed: the internet’s growing culture of young, alienated men wasn’t just a subculture, it was an untapped army. And the GOP was about to start recruiting.

Enter Milo Yiannopoulos. Loud, flamboyant, and funny in that “I can’t believe he just said that” kind of way, Milo knew exactly how to get attention. He used dark humor, trolling, and so-called “free speech” rhetoric to lure boys into a worldview where racism was “ironic,” misogyny was “hilarious,” and cruelty was just “edgy.”

We call it “recreational depravity.”

That same year, Bannon brought Milo into Breitbart to cover Gamergate—but Milo didn’t just report on Gamergate, he cheered it on. He framed it as a heroic battle against “social justice warriors” and feminism.

To thousands of young men who felt ignored or mocked by mainstream culture, Milo suddenly seemed like a voice for them. By October 2015, Breitbart made it official: Breitbart Tech launched with Milo as the face. This gave him three critical things:

• Institutional backing – the kind of legitimacy that turned trolling into “journalism.”

• A platform to target individuals as recruits, normalize harassment and drive coordinated attacks.

• A direct pipeline to donors and political operatives looking to weaponize this new digital force.

Bannon was using Breitbart as a type of digital boot camp.

Why this mattered:

By the time the 2016 election rolled around, these young men weren’t just gamers or spectators anymore—they were foot soldiers.

The same tactics honed during Gamergate were now aimed at journalists, politicians, and anyone who dared oppose Trump. This wasn’t just a subculture. It was a political force. They weren’t just voting—they were shaping narratives, swarming opponents online, and fueling Donald Trump’s rise to power.

The Stakes

The chilling part: Despite Milo’s fall from GOP favor, the structure remains intact—carried on through Shapiro, TPUSA, and Fuentes. The battlefield isn’t just TikTok or YouTube. It’s late-night Discord chats, Twitch streams, and algorithm-fed FYP content.

On the other side are men who understand exactly how to exploit your sons’ vulnerabilities: their loneliness, anger, and desire to belong.

After all, this predatory GOP propaganda machine has been funded and operating since the Reagan era—now, it’s simply on steroids.

Ben Shapiro, Charlie Kirk (TPUSA), and Nick Fuentes are three very different personalities—but the machine produces the same outcome, each using a different lure:

• Shapiro: Makes extremism sound smart.

• TPUSA: Wraps it in faith and patriotism.

• Fuentes: Takes the gloves off and says the quiet parts out loud.

We cannot continue to bury our heads in the sand as Trump and MAGA scapegoat the so-called “violent left.” This narrative has always been a distraction—a calculated tactic to deflect attention from their own extremism, corruption, and violence.

Please watch the above video, also linked here to share. This clip reflects years of deliberate conditioning by Trump’s political operatives, shaping these young men into exactly what we see today.

This goes beyond toxic content; it’s a calculated effort to mold the next generation of far-right extremists before they even realize what’s happening to them.

The only way to fight back is to confront the machine head-on, and to teach boys and young men how to recognize and resist it. Because if we don’t, the pipeline will continue to fill.

And one day, it won’t just be some random boy on a violent livestream.
It will be your boy.

Want the truth they’re not telling you? For fearless reporting and expert-backed research, read The Common Coalition Report. And if you believe in funding real, independent work—support our all-volunteer team here.